The MAH MBA CET 2026 Phase 2 examination concluded successfully at 4:30 PM on May 09 across multiple test centres. Candidates who appeared for Slot 1 and Slot 2 of MAH MBA CET 2026 can expect the detailed live exam analysis is now available on this page. The analysis will include section-wise difficulty level, important questions asked, good attempts, student reactions, and overall exam trends for both shifts based on expert reviews and candidate feedback.
This Story also Contains
The candidates can refer to the detailed MAH MBA CET Exam Pattern 2026 from the section below:
Particulars | Details |
Number of sections |
|
Number of questions | 200 |
Number of answer choices | Five options |
Total marks | 200 |
Exam duration | 150 minutes |
Mode of examination | Online |
Medium of examination | English |
MAH CET marking scheme | +1 mark for each correct answer No negative marking for incorrect answer |
To get a quick slot-wise breakdown and live student reactions, watch this short analysis video:
MAH MBA CET 2026 Phase 2 Exam Analysis: Slot 1, 2 Difficulty Level; Questions & Good Attempts
The overall difficulty level of the exam was easy to moderate, and the paper pattern remained largely similar to the April session. Most candidates found the paper manageable in terms of question distribution and navigation, although a few sections became time-consuming because of close options and pattern-heavy reasoning sets.
VARC was comparatively easy and highly scoring.
Logical Reasoning had a large number of puzzle and pattern-recognition based questions.
Abstract Reasoning was slightly tougher than expected because many questions required careful observation.
Quantitative Aptitude and DI was moderately difficult and slightly lengthy compared to the previous session.
The paper was not excessively lengthy overall, but smart question selection played an important role.
Several questions in AR and LR followed trends seen in previous year papers.
Candidates familiar with April session patterns had a clear advantage.
Logical Reasoning had the highest dominance of puzzles and pattern-based questions. The section was manageable, but candidates needed strong observation skills and quick elimination techniques.
Around 30 questions were puzzle-based.
There were 2 quant-based puzzle sets containing around 5 equations each.
Most singlet questions were easy and could be solved quickly.
Pattern recognition and arrangement-based questions formed a major chunk of the section.
The section rewarded candidates with strong practice in conventional MBA entrance LR sets.
Ranked among top 10 B-Schools in India by multiple publications | Top Recruiters-Google, MicKinsey, Amazon, BCG & many more.
400+ Company Visits | Highest CTC Offered: 21 LPA | Average CTC Offered: 8.65 LPA | 100% Placement Assurance
Topic | Approx. Questions |
Assertion Reasoning | 5 |
Syllogism | 5 |
Photo-Based Blood Relations | 5 |
Direction Sense | 6 |
Coding-Decoding | 3 |
Number Series & Odd One Out | 14 |
Permutation & Combination Puzzles | Multiple |
Alphabetical & Numerical Arrangement | Multiple |
Venn Diagram Based Puzzles | Multiple |
Overall Level: Easy to Moderate
Puzzle Sets: Moderate
Singlets: Easy
Pattern Recognition Questions: Time-consuming
VARC emerged as one of the easiest sections in the paper. Vocabulary and grammar questions were straightforward, and RC passages were readable with direct comprehension-based questions.
There were 4 RC passages based on:
Human Resource Management
Quality Management
Artificial Intelligence
Diet & Nutrition
Topic | Approx. Questions |
Grammatical Error Identification | Multiple |
Idioms & Phrases | Multiple |
Synonyms | 2 |
Antonyms | 3 |
Vocabulary-Based Questions | Easy |
Overall Level: Easy
Vocabulary: Easy and direct
RCs: Moderate length but easy to comprehend
Grammar Questions: Scoring
Candidates with decent reading speed and basic vocabulary preparation could attempt this section with high accuracy.
Abstract Reasoning was slightly more difficult than LR because several questions required deep visual analysis and pattern recognition. However, many questions were reportedly inspired by previous year paper patterns.
Topic | Approx. Questions |
Series-Based Questions | 16 |
Venn Diagram Based Questions | Basic Level |
Pattern Recognition | Multiple |
Overall Level: Moderate
Pattern-Based Questions: Slightly difficult
PYQ Similarity: High
Students who practiced previous year abstract reasoning questions had a significant advantage in this section.
QADI was considered slightly more difficult and lengthy compared to the April session. While core concepts remained formula-based, the DI sets and close options increased the overall solving time.
Topic | Approx. Questions |
Geometry & Mensuration | 5 |
Algebra | Multiple |
Data Interpretation | 2 Sets |
Quant-Based Puzzle DI | Included |
One DI set was particularly tricky.
DI options were very close, increasing chances of calculation errors.
Algebra maintained a decent weightage.
Geometry and Mensuration had noticeable presence.
Calculation accuracy was extremely important.
Overall Level: Moderate
DI: Moderate to Difficult
QA: Moderate but lengthy
Although the concepts were not extremely advanced, time management and question selection were crucial due to lengthy calculations and confusing options.
VARC was the most scoring section.
LR had heavy puzzle dominance.
AR required strong visualization skills.
QADI was the most time-consuming section.
The overall paper closely followed the April session trend.
Candidates with balanced preparation across LR patterns, RC reading speed, and DI calculations would have performed well in this slot.
The MAH MBA CET 2026 Slot 2 exam conducted on 9 May was moderate in overall difficulty level. The paper was largely speed-driven, with easier Abstract Reasoning and manageable Verbal Ability sections helping candidates maximize attempts. Logical Reasoning was lengthy despite fewer puzzle sets, while Quantitative Aptitude focused heavily on arithmetic and calculation-intensive DI questions.
Candidates who maintained strong time management and selection strategy were able to attempt a significant number of questions with good accuracy.
Section | Difficulty Level | Nature of Questions |
Logical Reasoning | Moderate to Difficult | Lengthy standalone reasoning questions |
Abstract Reasoning | Easy | Direct visual pattern questions |
Quantitative Aptitude | Moderate | Arithmetic and DI focused |
Verbal Ability & RC | Easy to Moderate | Vocabulary and RC dominant |
Overall | Moderate | Speed-based and manageable |
The Logical Reasoning section was lengthy and dominated by standalone logical reasoning questions instead of large puzzle arrangements. Unlike several previous slots, candidates did not encounter many conventional set-based puzzles. The section required continuous focus and quick interpretation skills.
Topic | Approximate Presence |
In-Out Arrangement | Moderate |
Critical Reasoning | 2–3 Questions |
Family Tree | 3–4 Questions |
Sequence-Based Logic | Moderate |
Syllogism | Present |
Analogies | Present |
Ranking Test | Present |
Standalone LR Questions | Dominant |
No major puzzle clusters were reported.
Most questions appeared independently.
In-Out arrangement questions were asked.
Critical Reasoning questions were direct and manageable.
Family Tree and sequence-based logic had noticeable weightage.
Syllogism and analogy questions were included.
Ranking test questions appeared in moderate quantity.
The section became time-consuming because of reading and logical interpretation.
Last Date to Apply: 30th May | Ranked #36 amongst institutions in Management by NIRF | 100% Placement
Last Date to Apply: 14th May | 400+ Recruiters | Highest CTC 25 LPA | Average CTC 8 LPA | 92% Placements in 2025 | Ranked as Platinum Institute | Awarded Best Business School of the Year
Parameter | Analysis |
Conceptual Difficulty | Moderate |
Lengthiness | High |
Puzzle Complexity | Low |
Attemptability | Moderate |
The Verbal Ability and Reading Comprehension section was among the easier sections of the paper. Candidates reported that vocabulary questions were straightforward, while RC passages were moderate in length and mostly direct in questioning style.
RC Passage Topics |
Immunity |
Neurology |
Music |
Economics |
Around four RC passages were reported.
Vocabulary formed a major part of the section.
Synonyms and phrase-based vocabulary questions appeared.
Approximately 10–12 vocabulary questions were asked.
RC passages were readable and manageable.
Most questions were direct rather than inference-heavy.
Grammar contribution remained comparatively lower.
Parameter | Analysis |
Overall Difficulty | Easy to Moderate |
RC Difficulty | Moderate |
Vocabulary Level | Easy |
Reading Intensity | Moderate |
The Quantitative Aptitude section was arithmetic-heavy and calculation-intensive. Candidates reported that Data Interpretation played an important role, with multiple sets requiring quick numerical calculations and approximation techniques.
Topic | Weightage |
Arithmetic | High |
Data Interpretation | 3 Sets |
Probability | Moderate |
Number System | Moderate |
Time, Speed & Distance | Present |
Time & Work | Present |
Arithmetic dominated the overall section.
Three DI sets were reported.
Questions involved lengthy calculations.
Probability and Number System questions appeared.
Time and Work questions were included.
Time, Speed and Distance maintained regular presence.
Fast calculation ability was extremely important.
Parameter | Analysis |
Overall Difficulty | Moderate |
Calculation Intensity | High |
DI Complexity | Moderate |
Speed Requirement | Very High |
Abstract Reasoning was the easiest section of the Slot 2 paper. Most questions were directly pattern-based and did not involve complicated visual interpretation.
Pattern recognition questions dominated the section.
No difficult counting-series questions were reported.
Visual logic was straightforward.
Shape-based reasoning was simple and quick to solve.
Candidates found this section highly scoring.
Parameter | Analysis |
Overall Difficulty | Easy |
Visual Complexity | Low |
Time Consumption | Low |
Scoring Opportunity | High |
The MAH MBA CET 2026 9 May Slot 2 paper maintained a balanced structure with moderate overall difficulty. Abstract Reasoning and VARC provided scoring opportunities, while Logical Reasoning demanded time due to standalone logical interpretation questions. Quantitative Aptitude tested speed and calculation efficiency through arithmetic-heavy questions and DI sets.
Candidates with strong sectional balance and efficient time allocation were likely to perform well in this slot.
Get your results instantly with our calculator!
Following the same trend, the overall paper had a moderate difficulty level with slight variations across slots. Based on the student feedback trends, the MAH CET 2026 difficulty level slot wise ranged from easy to moderate.
Section | Difficulty Level |
Verbal Ability & Reading Comprehension (VARC) | Easy |
Logical Reasoning (LR) | Easy to Moderate |
Abstract Reasoning (AR) | Moderate |
Quantitative Aptitude & DI (QADI) | Moderate |
Overall Difficulty | Easy to Moderate |
Section | Difficulty Level |
Verbal Ability & Reading Comprehension (VARC) | Easy to Moderate |
Logical Reasoning (LR) | Moderate to Difficult |
Abstract Reasoning (AR) | Easy |
Quantitative Aptitude (QA) | Moderate |
Overall Difficulty | Moderate |
With the MAH MBA CET 2026 analysis now available, candidates with strong speed and accuracy were able to achieve a safe number of attempts within a competitive range. Based on student reactions and slot-wise analysis, the MAH MBA CET 2026 good attempts varied slightly across slots, especially in sessions where Logical Reasoning sets or Quantitative Aptitude questions were lengthy.
Section | Good Attempts |
VARC | 26–28 |
Logical Reasoning | 59–62 |
Abstract Reasoning | 15–18 |
Quantitative Aptitude | 32–35 |
Overall Safe Attempts | 132–143 |
Section | Good Attempts |
VARC | 26–28 |
Logical Reasoning | 55–58 |
Abstract Reasoning | 16–18 |
Quantitative Aptitude | 30–33 |
Overall Safe Attempts | 127–137 |
Many aspirants prefer using MAH MBA CET ebooks to understand the exam pattern and streamline their exam preparation. These ebooks also offer a proper approach and short tricks to easily solve the MAH CET 2026 memory based paper. Go through the section below to get the download links for the ebooks.
Ebook Name | Download Link |
MAH MBA CET 2026 Preparation Tips | |
MAH MBA CET 2025 Memory-Based Questions | |
MAH CET MBA Syllabus | |
Top B Schools Accepting 60 to 90 percentile in MAH MBA CET |
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
No, the MAH MBA CET 2026 Phase 2 exam has not been conducted yet. The live analysis for Slot 1 and Slot 2 will be updated after the exam based on student reactions and expert reviews.
The analysis will include section-wise difficulty level, important topics, number of questions asked, good attempts, and overall exam difficulty for both slots.
If the authorities follow previous year trends, the exam is expected to be moderate in difficulty, with Logical Reasoning and Abstract Reasoning likely to be slightly lengthy.
Since the exam is yet to be held, exact good attempts are not available. However, based on previous trends, the expected good attempts may vary depending on slot difficulty and accuracy level.
The final comparison will only be available after both slots conclude. In previous years, some variation in question pattern and difficulty level was observed between different exam sessions.
On Question asked by student community
Hello,
MHCET is mainly for engineering, pharmacy, law, and agriculture courses.
For business courses like BBA, BMS, or MBA, MHCET is not used.
Business courses usually have their own entrance exams like:
MAH BBA CET
MAH MBA CET
CUET (for some colleges)
Hope it helps!
Hi
The MHA MBA CET is available on our official website. The MBA CET 2025 exam for MBA admission takes place on April 1, 2 and 3, 2025. Candidates check the previous year's questions using the previous year's question paper and understand the structure of the exam pattern. Using the
With a 91.16 percentile in MAH MBA CET 2025, you have a good chance of securing admission in decent MBA colleges in Maharashtra. While top institutes like JBIMS or Sydenham may be out of reach, colleges such as PUMBA, SIES, Chetana’s, MET, and DY Patil are realistic options. Among these,
With 91.16 percentile, you can target top-tier MBA colleges like PUMBA (Pune University), MET Mumbai, SIESCOMS Navi Mumbai, and NL Dalmia. Welingkar and K J Somaiya may be slightly out of reach but possible under lower cutoffs or spot round.
With 42 percentile in MAH MBA CET, it is very difficult to get admission in good or top MBA colleges through CAP rounds. Most of the well-known colleges in Maharashtra like JBIMS, SIMSREE, Welingkar, and PUMBA usually take students who score more than 90 or 99 percentile. Even average colleges
Ranked among top 10 B-Schools in India by multiple publications | Top Recruiters-Google, MicKinsey, Amazon, BCG & many more.
MBA @ P P Savani University | NAAC A+ Grade | 100% Placement Assistance | Apply Now
AICTE Approved | NBA Accredited | NAAC A+(2nd Cycle) Accredited. Highest CTC: 24 LPA | Average CTC: 11.17 LPA
98.74% Students Placed | 180+ Recruiters on Campus | Average CTC 7.25 LPA
Highest CTC 16 LPA | Top Recruiters: Accenture, TCS, Tech Mahindra, Capgemini, Microsoft
Recognized as Category-1 Deemed to be University by UGC | 41,000 + Alumni Imprints Globally | Students from over 20+ countries