MAH MBA CET Analysis 2026 for Day 2
The MAH MBA CET 2026 Day 2 exam was conducted on April 7 in two shifts. The morning slot took place from 9:00 AM to 11:30 AM, followed by the afternoon slot from 2:00 PM to 4:30 PM across multiple centres.
MAH MBA CET Analysis 2026 Day 2 Slot 1
The overall structure of the paper remained very similar to Day 1, with no major surprises in terms of pattern or question types. The difficulty level was easy to moderate, but the length of the paper made it challenging to manage time effectively.
The paper was doable for most candidates, but it required careful question selection to maximize attempts. One noticeable change was the absence of puzzles in Logical Reasoning, which is slightly unusual compared to typical CET patterns.
The exam leaned more towards accuracy and strategy rather than just speed. Reading Comprehension passages and LR singlet questions added to the time pressure, making the paper feel longer than its actual difficulty level.
Overall, the paper can be described as lengthy but manageable for well-prepared candidates.
VARC (Verbal Ability and Reading Comprehension)
This section had a strong focus on grammar, making it scoring for candidates with clear fundamentals. Reading Comprehension carried significant weightage and required careful time allocation.
Topic-wise Question Distribution
| Topic | Questions |
|---|
| Reading Comprehension (4 passages) | 20 |
| Grammar (Error Detection, Sentence Correction) | 15–16 |
| Vocabulary (Synonyms, Antonyms, Usage) | 8–10 |
Out of the four RC passages, three were easy to moderate, while one was slightly difficult. Although the passages were easy to understand, they were lengthy, which increased the time required per question.
Grammar-based questions were straightforward and formed a major scoring area. Vocabulary questions were mostly direct. Overall, the section was easy to moderate but time-consuming due to RC length.
Logical Reasoning (LR)
The LR section was dominated by standalone questions instead of set-based puzzles.
Topic-wise Question Distribution
Most questions were individual and required careful reading. The absence of puzzles made the section more predictable, but the singlet format increased the time required per question.
Overall, the section was easy to moderate but slightly lengthy.
Abstract Reasoning (AR)
This section followed the standard CET pattern and was one of the easiest parts of the paper.
Topic-wise Question Distribution
| Topic | Questions |
|---|
| Counting Figures (Triangles, Squares, Rectangles) | Multiple |
| Odd One Out | Multiple |
| Missing Figure / Pattern | Multiple |
Questions were direct and based on visual logic. Candidates with practice could attempt this section quickly. The section required observation skills rather than calculations.
Overall difficulty level was easy.
Quantitative Aptitude (QA)
The Quant section was easy to moderate but lengthy, mainly due to calculation-based questions.
Topic-wise Question Distribution
| Topic | Questions |
|---|
| Data Interpretation (2 sets) | 2 |
| Arithmetic (TSD, P&L, Mixtures) | Major Share |
| Algebra | Significant Presence |
Out of the two DI sets, one was easy while the other was slightly difficult. Arithmetic topics such as Time, Speed and Distance, Profit and Loss, and Mixtures were prominent.
A noticeable number of Algebra questions were also included. Most questions were doable, but calculations increased the time required.
Overall, the section was easy to moderate, but managing time effectively was important.
Key Takeaways
The Day 2 Slot 1 paper maintained consistency with previous slots in terms of pattern and difficulty. The main challenge was the length of the paper rather than the complexity of questions.
Candidates who focused on accuracy, selected questions wisely, and managed time efficiently were able to perform better.