One of the most powerful and common phrases in the higher education sector is 100 per cent placement guaranteed. It acts as a powerful marketing tool; it is splashed across prospectuses, hoardings, and counselling sessions. Not only does it act like a safety net, comfort, and ROI, but it also tends to attract anxious parents and first-time students.
This Story also Contains
However, if you start digging, you will realise that it paints a different story. Data and institutional practices throw light on a system that benefits colleges far more than students.
The table helps track and analyse student intake, graduation, and placement results across institutes by considering their ranking and how it affects employability. The intake Vs placed difference shows the increasing gap between admission and actual placement, especially if we look at colleges that do not fall in the top-ranked colleges category.
| Ranking Bracker | No. Of Institutes | Intake 2022-23 | Admitted 2022-23 | Graduated 2023-24 | Placed 2022 -23 | Intake Vs Placed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Rank 1st to 50th | 50 | 19639 | 18650 (94.96%) | 18110 (92.21%) | 16393 (83.47%) | - 17% |
Rank 51st to 100th | 50 | 14900 | 14234 (95.53%) | 13742 (92.23%) | 11745 (78.83%) | - 21% |
Non Ranked | 580 | 86973 | 77472 (89.08%) | 67278 (77.36%) | 49640 (57.08%) | - 43% |
Overall | 680 | 121512 | 110356 (90.82%) | 99130 (81.58%) | 77778 (64.01%) | - 36% |
The table displays the placement data of approximately 680 institutes, revealing a significant gap between the sanctioned intake and actual placements. There were over 1.21 lakh students who were admitted in 2022-23, out of which only about 64 per cent were eventually ‘shown’ as placed. More than one-third of students who were admitted disappeared from the placement statistics, not because they found a job somewhere else, but because the system quietly removed them from the count.
Even the top-ranked colleges have not been spared, as the difference between intake and placement figures is from 17 per cent to 21 per cent. When it comes to non-ranked institutions, the gap is even more is 43 per cent.
This raises a serious question about how “100 per cent placements” are fabricated.
There are multiple ways and means through which this is done; we are going to highlight the most prominent ones.
One of the most routine ways to disqualify students even before the placements begin is by reducing the number of students who sit for placements. Students with backlogs, low attendance, or low internal scores are not allowed to register for placements. Once they are out of the system, they are omitted from the official narrative. The college claims near-total placement success, but only after filtering out such students.
Another means to reduce the number of actual placements is by asking the unplaced students to formally ‘Opt Out’ when the placement cycle is about to come to finish. This is like an administrative formality, which convinces students that it would not hurt their job prospects.
The ‘Opt Out’ move allows the institutes to formally close the placement cycle. If a student goes for the ‘Opt Out” option, it also shifts the placement responsibility from the institution onto students who fail to secure a job. In short, the institute does not have any accountability after the students opt for this option.
Institutions often claim that several students opt for higher education or entrepreneurship. However, the data shows that when both sets of students are combined, they form nearly 38 per cent of the overall graduates; this percentage increases further in the non-ranked colleges.
| Ranking Bracket | No of Institutes | Graduated 2023-24 | Higher Studies 2023-24 | Drop out | Higher Studies & Dropout % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Rank 1st to 50th | 50 | 18110 | 232 | 3246 | 17.71 % |
Rank 51st to 100th | 50 | 13742 | 329 | 3155 | 23.38 % |
Non Ranked | 580 | 67278 | 1544 | 37333 | 44.70 % |
Total | 680 | 99130 | 2105 | 43734 | 37.72 % |
Colleges often argue that many students choose higher education or entrepreneurship. But data shows that when higher studies and dropouts are combined, they account for nearly 38 per cent of graduates overall, and almost 45 per cent in non-ranked colleges. These two sets of students are seldom counted as ‘unplaced’, even though higher studies are not a choice, but an imposed alternative to unemployment.
Some institutions absorb students into their own subsidiaries and divisions, or associated startups. Most of the roles in such companies are temporary, unpaid, and in certain cases entirely unrelated to the student’s degree. This is a classic example where the placement statistics for this particular activity are inflated without creating any employment value. In most cases, the majority of students are let go once the next batch of students is about to graduate.
The most disturbing admission comes from the placement officers themselves. As per certain testimonies, colleges have increasingly started issuing fake offer letters. In some cases, names of legitimate recruiters have been misused by paying shell firms to “hire” students on paper.

“These jobs are often only on paper,” admits a senior placement officer, adding that the number of colleges using such tactics has risen sharply in the past two years as hiring slowed.
There are also instances where students are driven into internships with promises of conversion. Although these so-called internships do not really assure employment, they are treated as placements during audits and ranking. For students, this means delayed income and extended uncertainty, whereas for colleges, it is a convenient checkbox!
In certain colleges, there have been cases where a student joining the family business is considered a ‘placed’ student, even though no campus recruitment took place. Although self-employment is a valid option, treating and presenting it as a campus placement is misleading.
There is an immense amount of pressure to displace high placement numbers as it is used as a key marketing tool as well as in ranking, admissions, accreditation requirement and justification for fees. As auditing for placement is negligible, colleges and institutes make the most of these grey areas without worrying about the consequences.
Guaranteed 100 per cent placement is a myth, especially in the current times, where the job market is volatile due to various factors. Unless you are in the top 10 institutes, never believe the 100 per cent placement guarantee that other colleges claim. When colleges claim to have 100 per cent placement, they are not offering certainty; they are offering comfort, which in the current system comes at the cost of truth.
On Question asked by student community
Hello,
Here are some top colleges accepting XAT and CAT exams :
Top colleges accepting CAT:
IIMs (All Indian Institutes of Management)
FMS Delhi
SPJIMR Mumbai
MDI Gurgaon
IIT Bombay (SJMSOM)
IIT Delhi (DMS)
IIFT
IMT Ghaziabad
JBIMS Mumbai
Top colleges accepting XAT:
XLRI Jamshedpur
XIMB Bhubaneswar
IMT Ghaziabad
Great
Hi there,
A female candidate with a CAT percentile of 67.97 and low sectional scores should target private and tier-2/3 B-schools that accept overall CAT scores in the 60–70 percentile range and have flexible sectional criteria.
Some suitable options include AIMS Institute Bangalore, Doon Business School Dehradun, Christ Institute of
Hi there,
Yes, you are eligible for XISS Ranchi with a CAT percentile of 67.60.
According to recent admission trends, the CAT cutoff for the PGDM in Human Resource Management for the general category has been around 60 percentile. For other programs such as Marketing, Finance, and Rural Management, the
Hi there,
Careers360 offers a wide range of eBooks and study materials to assist with CAT preparation. You can access past CAT question papers with solutions to understand the exam pattern and difficulty level. Additionally, there are quantitative aptitude handbooks, cheat sheets, and section-specific practice sets for arithmetic, algebra, and
Hi there,
The minimum eligibility criteria for a general candidate to receive a call from IIM Sambalpur are as follows:
VARC: 65%ile
QUANTS: 65%ile
LRDI: 65%ile
Overall: 90%tile
Keep practising and aim to improve your score. You can also focus on other management exams where you may secure a strong
Ranked among top 10 B-Schools in India by multiple publications | Top Recruiters-Google, MicKinsey, Amazon, BCG & many more.
Last Date to Apply: 10th Feb | Globally Recognized by AACSB (US) & AMBA (UK) | 17.8 LPA Avg. CTC for PGPM 2025
Applications Deadline - 23rd March 2026 | Offers full-time PGP in International Master in business (IMB) Equivalent to MBA under following specializations Marketing, HR, Operations, and many more
Applications Deadline - 31st January 2026 | AICTE Approved | Ranked #59 by NIRF 2025 | Highest CTC: 29 LPA | Avg. CTC: 16.4 LPA
Highest Package 27.25 LPA | Top 100 Average package 16.65 LPA | AACSB Accredited | Ranked 52 by QS International
Highest CTC 30 LPA | #9 in Management Category by Times B-School | Merit-Based Scholarship Upto - 50 Crores