SNAP 2025 Exam Analysis (Test 1, 2 and 3) Live Now: Difficulty Level, Good Attempts & Expected Cutoff

SNAP Exam Pattern 2025

SNAP 2025 is being conducted as per the official exam pattern that specifies the structure of the paper and the marking scheme. Below is the expected SNAP 2025 exam pattern:

Details of Sections: SNAP 2025 Exam Pattern

SNAP Marking Scheme

• -0.25 for each incorrect answer

• No sectional time limit

SNAP 2025 Exam Timing

SNAP 2025 Exam Analysis - Test-Wise

The SNAP 2025 exam varies slightly from one test to another, making a test-wise breakdown crucial for understanding shifts in difficulty, trends in question types, and overall performance expectations. This analysis outlines how each test differs in section-level difficulty, ideal attempt ranges, and expected scores, allowing candidates to evaluate their performance and compare patterns across General English, Analytical & Logical Reasoning, and Quantitative aptitude + DI & DS.

This comparison helps aspirants understand slot-wise changes, refine score predictions, and track broader exam trends. Below, you will find the complete Test 1 analysis for each section, and detailed insights for subsequent tests will be added after their respective exam days.

SNAP 2025 Test 1 Slot 1 Exam Analysis

English

• The difficulty level ranged from easy to moderate.

• A strong focus on vocabulary: idioms, proverbs, synonyms, and similar meanings.

• Fillers and prepositions were asked in simple, context-based formats.

• One question tested the meaning of “prognostication.”

• An analogy question appeared (example: soporific → sleep).

Logical Reasoning

• The section was moderate and largely approachable.

• Two questions were based on a number series.

• A data sufficiency problem centred on a government subsidy context.

• Multiple items tested blood relation concepts.

• A floor arrangement puzzle involving lunch items was included.

• A three-person puzzle appeared.

• Seating arrangement questions featured:

  • A set of six people facing North.

  • Another arrangement governed by conditions on P, Q, R, S, T.

• Syllogism and statement–inference questions were present.

• One question was asked from coded reasoning.

Quantitative Aptitude

• Overall difficulty was moderate to high compared to the other sections.

• The section included a blend of arithmetic, algebra, geometry, and application-style problems.

• Key topics:

  • Profit & Loss

  • Average weight

  • Age-based questions

  • Voting arithmetic

  • Remainder theorem

  • Concentric circles

  • Cylinder calculations

• Geometry featured a Triangle Park problem based on a 15–14–13 triangle.

• SI–CI difference question: 2 years at 10%, difference Rs 150, find the principal.

• A pipe system problem involved three pipes with combined filling and emptying speeds.

• Work & Time: Amit and Brijesh are working together, with Amit leaving 6 days earlier.

• LCM-based problem: traffic lights changing at 48 s, 72 s, 108 s.

• Trigonometry:
  tan⁡θ+cot⁡θ=4, find tan2⁡θ+cot2⁡θ.

• Sequence question:
  Sn=3n2−2n, find the 5th term.

• Logarithmic equation:
  log2⁡x+log2⁡(x−2)=x.

• A time–distance question referencing the Vande Bharat Express.

• Permutation: number of arrangements of the word DELHI.

SNAP 2025 Test 1 Slot 2 Exam Analysis

1. Verbal Ability (Easy Level)

• Candidates across Slot 2 agreed that VA was comfortable and high-scoring.

• Slot 2 featured no Reading Comprehension, unlike Slot 1, which had one brief business-oriented RC.

• The section leaned strongly on grammar application, including:

  • A large share of error-spotting questions

  • Grammar-driven fill-in-the-blanks

  • A few active–passive voice transformations

  • Light sentence correction/improvement items

• Vocabulary inputs included:

  • Synonyms

  • Antonyms

  • Idioms & phrases

  • A couple of analogy-based questions

• A single para-jumble grounded in an economics theme was seen as approachable.

• Students appearing on 12 December should particularly revise:

  • Tenses

  • Pronouns

  • Conjunctions

  • Subject–verb agreement

• Accuracy was expected to remain very high given the clarity and simplicity of questions.

2. Logical Reasoning (Easy–Moderate, Speed-Critical)

• LR continued to be the make-or-break segment for most aspirants.

• Slot 2 unexpectedly introduced multiple puzzles, unlike Slot 1:

  • Two puzzles plus one arrangement, all solvable within the time for prepared students.

• The section covered a diverse mix of topics:

  • Blood relations

  • Direction sense

  • Series-based problems

  • Coding–decoding (2 questions)

  • Syllogisms

  • Number-based reasoning (identify the missing 6th value)

  • Calendar & clock questions (fewer than Slot 1’s heavier presence)

  • Critical reasoning items (3–4 questions), including assumption, cause–and–effect, and inference

• Key recommendation:

  • Do not skip Calendar & Clock — these are recurring topics and will likely reappear.

• LR also included a quick DI-style set:

  • A simple table-based set that many missed due to time pressure, despite being extremely easy.

3. Quantitative Aptitude (Moderate, Heavily Formula-Based)

• Slot 2 Quant felt slightly more demanding than Slot 1 but remained manageable.

• Arithmetic dominated the section, exactly in line with SNAP’s usual pattern.

• Frequently reported topics included:

  • Simple & Compound Interest (1–2 questions)

  • Time & Work (1 question)

  • Profit & Loss

  • A basic upstream–downstream problem

  • Ratio, percentage, and proportion

• Additional subsections showed up as well:

  • Logarithms: 2 questions

  • Coordinate Geometry: 3 questions (more than Slot 1)

  • Mensuration: hexagon fold/perimeter-type problem

• Probability & P&C distribution:

  • Slot 1 had Probability

  • Slot 2 featured one P&C question

• Algebra contributed a couple of basic equation questions.

• Number System appeared through a remainder theorem question.

• Quant DI included:

  • A small bar/line/table graph offering 3–4 quick, straightforward questions

• Overall tone: direct formula application, minimal trickery, but required solid speed.

Comparison: Slot 1 vs Slot 2

SNAP 2025 Test 2 Slot 1 Exam Analysis

SNAP 2025 Test 2 Slot 1 Paper was slightly longer compared to SNAP 2025 Test 1 Paper. However, despite the increased length, the overall difficulty level of the question paper was easy.

General English Section

The overall difficulty level of the exam was easy to moderate and was easier compared to Test 1.

Analytical & Logical Reasoning Section

The overall difficulty level of the Logical Reasoning section was moderate.

Topic-wise distribution and difficulty:

• Critical Reasoning: 3–4 questions; easy in terms of difficulty

• Arrangements: 3 questions, including a number-based pyramid arrangement

• Family Tree and Blood Relations: 2 questions

• Syllogisms: 2–3 questions

• Coding–Decoding: 2 questions

• Series: 1 question; easy

• Calendar: 2 questions

• Clock: 2 questions

Quantitative, Data Interpretation & Data Sufficiency Section

The Quantitative Aptitude section was lengthy and calculative, making time management a key challenge for many candidates. Overall, this section was on the tougher side compared to the SNAP Test 1 Paper.

Topic-wise distribution:

• Percentage: 1 question

• Logarithms and Indices: 2–3 questions

• Time and Work: 2 questions

• Time, Speed, and Distance: 2 questions

• Mixtures and Alligation: 2 questions

• Unit digit and LCM HCF: 1 question

• No questions were asked from the DI section.

SNAP 2025 Test 2 Slot 2 Exam Analysis

The paper was similar in approach to Slot 1, making it overall doable for prepared candidates.

General English Section

• One question was based on idioms and phrases.

• Antonyms- and synonyms-based questions were included.

Analytical & Logical Reasoning Section

• The overall difficulty level was easy.

• One question was based on a series.

• Critical Reasoning questions were easy.

• Two questions were from coding–decoding.

• 3–4 questions were from the clock and calendar.

• One question was based on a circular arrangement of 8 people.

• 2–3 questions were from the arrangements overall.

Quantitative, Data Interpretation & Data Sufficiency Section

• Quantitative Aptitude was easy to moderate in terms of difficulty level.

• The Arithmetic section was lengthy and calculative.

• Most of the questions were from Arithmetic.

• Coordinate Geometry: 1 question.

• One question was based on a table, which was calculative (based on the highest percentage of car production).

SNAP 2025 Test 3 Exam Analysis

SNAP 2025 Test 3 Slot 1 had an overall easy to moderate difficulty level. General English and Logical Reasoning turned out to be scoring sections, while Quantitative Aptitude played a key role due to its lengthy and calculation-intensive questions. Candidates who managed their time well and maintained calculation accuracy were able to perform better.

SNAP 2025 Test 3 Slot 1

Compared to SNAP Test 1, SNAP 2025 Test 3 Slot 1 was relatively easier and followed a familiar exam pattern similar to other slots. Although there were no unexpected changes in the paper structure, many candidates felt the exam was lengthy, making time management an important factor for completing the test comfortably.

General English (Easy & Scoring)

The General English section was easy and highly scoring for well-prepared candidates. The question mix was similar to previous SNAP tests, with a strong focus on grammar concepts.

Key Topics Covered:

• Idioms and Phrases

• Proverbs-based question

• 10–11 questions based on Grammar

• Modals and Auxiliary Verbs

• Parts of Speech

• Pattern closely matched SNAP Test 1 and Test 2

Accuracy levels were high as most questions were direct and concept-based.

Logical Reasoning Analysis (Easy, High Accuracy Section)

The Logical Reasoning section was easy, allowing candidates to attempt most questions confidently. Critical reasoning questions were straightforward and not time-consuming.

Topics Asked in Logical Reasoning:

• Alphanumeric Series – 1 question

• Binary Logic – 1 question

• Calendar-based question (easy)

• Decision Making – 1 question

• 3 questions from Critical Reasoning

• Blood Relations – 1 question

• Clocks – 1 question

• Coding–Decoding – 1 question

• Syllogism – 1 question

This section rewarded speed and conceptual clarity.

Quantitative Aptitude Analysis (Moderate to Difficult & Lengthy)

The Quantitative Aptitude section was the most time-consuming in SNAP 2025 Test 3 Slot 1. Candidates reported lengthy and calculation-heavy questions, making it tougher than QA sections in earlier SNAP tests.

Topic-wise Question Distribution:

• Ratio and Proportion – 1 question

• Profit and Loss – 1 question

• Time and Distance – 1 question

• Logarithms – 2 questions

• Permutation & Combination and Probability – 5 questions (1 tricky)

• Number Series – Easy

• Simple Interest & Compound Interest – 2 questions

• Percentage – 1 question

• Averages – 1 question

• Trigonometry – 2 questions

• Modern Mathematics – 4–5 questions (dominant)

• Geometry – No questions asked

This section demanded strong calculation speed and smart question selection.

SNAP 2025 Test 3 Slot 2 Analysis

Overall, SNAP 2025 Test 3 Slot 2 was easier than SNAP Test 1 but slightly trickier than SNAP Test 2. The paper fell in the easy to moderate range and was clearly easier than SNAP 2024. While the difficulty was manageable, a few sections felt lengthy and time-consuming, especially due to calculation-heavy questions.

General English

The General English section was largely straightforward and scoring for most candidates.

• The overall difficulty level ranged from easy to moderate.

• Fill-in-the-blank questions were asked, focusing on vocabulary and contextual usage.

• Preposition-based questions appeared, testing basic grammar concepts.

• Around three idiom-based questions were included, all familiar and commonly asked.

• The section was similar in nature to previous SNAP papers, with no unexpected twists.

• Candidates with decent grammar fundamentals could attempt most questions comfortably.

Logical Reasoning

The Logical Reasoning section was mostly on the easier side, with a mix of familiar patterns.

• The overall difficulty level was easy to moderate.

• Four questions from a series were asked, including number-based and pattern-based series.

• A question based on the series tested basic mathematical reasoning.

• Critical Reasoning had a significant presence, with five questions in total.

• One clock-based question was asked, following a standard SNAP format.

• Only one Critical Reasoning question was tricky, while the rest were fairly direct.

• This section offered good scoring potential with smart question selection.

Quantitative Aptitude

The Quantitative Aptitude section was the most demanding in terms of time management.

• The section was moderate in difficulty but lengthy.

• 1–2 geometry questions were asked; these were time-consuming due to calculations.

• AP and GP questions appeared and were similar to those seen in Slot 1.

• Time and Work contributed two questions, both calculation-based.

• One logarithm question was asked, testing basic log properties.

• The section was largely calculative, which increased the time pressure.

• Accuracy mattered more than attempting a high number of questions here.

Overall Impression

• Difficulty level: Easy to Moderate

• Length: Moderate to Lengthy

• Best sections to score: General English and Logical Reasoning

• Most time-consuming section: Quantitative Aptitude

With balanced preparation and smart time allocation, SNAP 2025 Test 3 Slot 2 was a well-manageable paper and offered good scoring opportunities, especially for candidates strong in reasoning and verbal ability.

Overall Paper Comparison

SNAP 2025 Test 1 Memory-Based Questions and Analysis

This section includes the updated SNAP 2025 ebook featuring Test 1 memory-based questions and a detailed section-wise analysis. It brings together all key insights from the first test, offering candidates a focused resource to understand the exam pattern, question style, and difficulty before attempting the upcoming sessions.

SNAP 2025 Test 2 Memory Based Questions

General English

1- If TACITURN : GARRULOUS, then Insolvent : ________

2- The startup would not have secured the funding _________ its innovative business model and the founder’s compelling pitch.

1. if not for it was

2. unless it was for

3. if it had been for

4. had it not been for

3- The old bureaucratic system was a labyrinth of red tape, where a single request could take months to be processed.

1. Simile

2. Metaphor

3. Paradox

4. Euphemism

4- The old library in Pune contained several recondite texts on ancient Indian philosophy that were accessible only to a handful of scholars.

1. Popular

2. Manifest

3. Esoteric

4. Pedestrian

5- The drone flew high above the city of Jaipur, capturing breathtaking aerial footage.

Identify the part of speech for the underlined word.

6- The _______ crafted silver filigree from Cuttack is _______ sought after by collectors worldwide.

1. Delicately, high

2. Dedicate, high

3. Delicate, highly

4. Delicately, highly

7- The new quality control manager was determined to ________ all the outdated procedures in the factory.

1. Do away with

2. Get along with

3. Give in to

4. Make up to

8- The CEO’s decision to resign came as a _________ shock to the employees and the stock market.

1. Crude

2. Raw

3. Rude

4. Stark

Logical Reasoning

1- What was the day on 15th August, 1947?

2- Which year matched the calendar of 2007?

3- If a clock gets slow by 5 minutes every hour, and it was correct at 6 AM on Monday, what will be the time at 6 PM on Tuesday?

4- Find the missing number: 5, 7, 13, 25, 45, ______

5- Find the missing term: Q3F, S5J, U8N, W12R, ______

6- Find the missing term: 1, 2, 6, 30, 210, ______

7- Which letter will replace the question mark?

1. R

2. Q

3. S

4. P

8- Statements:

• Some cats are black.

• Some black things are big.

Conclusions:

• Some cats are big.

• All big things are black.

9- Find the missing number: 2, 10, 30, 68, 130, ______

10- Statements:

All metals are conductors.

No insulators are conductors.

Conclusions:

No metal is an insulator.

Some calculators are metal.

1. Neither 1 nor 2 follows

2. Only 1 follow

3. Only 2 follow

4. Both 1 and 2 follow

Quantitative Aptitude

1- Find the unit digit of 1! + 2! + 3! + … + 100!

2- If a man covers 1/3rd distance at speeds 10 km/h, 20 km/h, and 60 km/h, find the average speed.

3- If the HCF of two numbers is 15 and their product is 1800, find the LCM.

4- Two dice (red and blue) are thrown. Find the probability that the sum is prime and the number on red dice is greater than blue dice.

5- Given two pairs of lines:
K:
x+2y=11
2x−y=7

L:
x+2y=11
2x+y=7
Find the difference in values of x in K and L.

6- Given points A(1,2), B(3,8), C(7,k) are collinear. Find k.

7- If 10 men take 12 days to complete work and 12 women take 15 days to complete the same work, find the time taken by 6 men and 6 women.

8- Evaluate: sin3⁡θ+cos3⁡θsin⁡θ+cos⁡θ+sin3⁡θ−cos3⁡θsin⁡θ−cos⁡θ

9- A furniture store makes a profit of 25% after offering a discount of 20% on a sofa. If the cost price (CP) increases by 10% and the store still offers the same 20% discount, what is the new profit percentage?

10- A laddu from a shop has a radius of 3.5 cm. If 10 such laddus are packed in a cubical box, what is the approximate total volume occupied by 10 laddus (in cm)?

SNAP 2025 Test 3 Memory Based Question

Candidates can find the SNAP Test 3 2025 memory based questions asked in the exam from the section below.

General English

1. The investigative journalist uncovered a _____ between corrupt officials and powerful construction lobby in Mumbai.

A. Cover-up

B. Hidden deal

C. Up-cover

D. Covering up

Answer- Hidden deal

2. The _______ of the factory was a major blow to the local economy, as it was the largest employer in the small town of Tiruppur.

A. Close up

B. Close down

C. Closedown

D. Shut off

Answer- Closedown

3. In compliance ___ new environmental regulations, the factory in Manesar was retrofitted ___ a state-of-the-art filtration system.

A. with, with
B. of, with
C. to, by
D. for, into

“In compliance with” is the correct prepositional phrase.
“Retrofitted with” is the correct verb–preposition combination.

. Correct answer: (a)

4. For past 5 years, the weaver of Kanchipuram ___ ancient techniques with modern designs, a fusion that now ___ international acclaim.

A. blend, receives
B. have been blending, is receiving
C. were blending, received
D. had been blending, has been receiving

“For past 5 years” indicates an action continuing till the present, so present perfect continuous is required.
The second blank refers to a present ongoing result, so present continuous fits.

Correct answer: B

5. ___ had the monsoon arrived in Mumbai ___ the city’s drainage systems were overwhelmed, leading to widespread waterlogging.

A. As soon as, then
B. No sooner, than
C. Not only, but also
D. Scarcely, then

The correct correlative conjunction is “No sooner … than”, used for immediate succession of events.

Correct answer: B

6. You ___ have told me you were coming to Delhi; I ___ have arranged a car to pick you up from the airport.

A. must, will
B. may, must
C. can, should
D. could, would

The sentence expresses a missed past possibility.
“Could have” and “would have” correctly express unreal past conditions.

Correct answer: D

Logical Reasoning

Quantitative Aptitude

Why SNAP 2025 Exam Analysis Matters

A detailed SNAP 2025 analysis is essential because:

• It helps candidates estimate their expected overall score and percentile.

• It allows students to compare the difficulty level of Test 1 vs Test 2 vs Test 3.

• Students appearing for later tests can refine their strategies based on the question type distribution and sectional trend shifts.

• MBA aspirants planning for SNAP 2026 can understand long-term trends and prepare accordingly.

• The analysis also gives clarity on cutoffs for SIBM Pune, SCMHRD, and other top SIU colleges.

The SNAP 2025 Exam Analysis will play a crucial role for both current-year aspirants who want to estimate their performance and future aspirants who want to understand exam trends. As each test concludes, this page will provide the detailed analysis covering difficulty level, question distribution, section performance, and expected cutoffs. Stay tuned for real-time updates on Test 1, Test 2, and Test 3.