BIMTECH PGDM Admissions 2026
AACSB Accredited | Highest CTC: 22 LPA | Last Date: 31st December 2025
When I decided to prepare for CAT 2024, I wasn’t starting from scratch. Unlike many aspirants who dive into quant formulas or grammar rules, I was already neck-deep in academics, teaching, and side-projects. Being in my final year at IIT Delhi, and having taught JEE and Olympiad students since my very first year, I had a strong background in mathematics and problem-solving.
IIM Kozhikode will retain its three-stage admission process for the MBA (PGP) 2026–28 batch, with CAT 2025 scores carrying a final weightage of 35 percent. The minimum overall CAT cut-off for general category candidates remains at 85 percentile, with sectional qualifying scores required in VARC, DILR, and QA. Shortlisting of candidates will be based on CAT performance, academic record, and personal interview rounds.
In fact, the challenge for me was never whether I could handle the syllabus. It was always about whether I could manage time, balance all three sections, and stay consistent amidst the chaos of IIT courses, teaching jobs, projects, and music club commitments.
Looking back, my preparation was less of a “one-year crash course” and more of a journey of adapting what I already knew to a completely different exam format. The quant section (QA) felt like familiar territory - a more relaxed version of what I’d been teaching JEE kids for years. But DILR and VARC? That’s where the actual battle was.
In this article, I’ll share my complete CAT journey - how I started, what resources I used, how I structured my time, the mistakes I made, and what I learned. I’ll also talk about how I balanced CAT prep with my existing commitments, because honestly, that was the hardest part of it all.
My decision to take CAT 2024 wasn’t random. For years, I’d been fascinated by teaching and had worked with multiple edtechs, taught JEE, Olympiads, SAT, and AP, and even considered starting my own venture someday. An MBA felt like a possible extension of this interest - either as a backup plan or as a way to sharpen my leadership and business skills.
So, unlike a JEE kid who needs to build quant skills from zero, I walked into CAT prep with:
Strong Quant skills (teaching JEE math daily had already kept me sharp).
Decent logical thinking ability (from Olympiad-style problem solving).
A weakness in reading comprehension and speed (because my reading habit was patchy).
That initial self-awareness helped me a lot. I knew QA would be my strength; DILR could become manageable with practice; but VARC would demand the most effort.
The next step was to build a framework for preparation that worked for my schedule. I couldn’t study 8 hours a day like a full-time aspirant - because between my project, teaching part-time at multiple ventures, and music club practices, my daily prep time was about 2–3 focused hours.
My structure looked like this:
QA (Quantitative Aptitude): ~40% of my time. Not because I needed to learn new concepts, but because I wanted to maximize accuracy and attempt rate. I revised arithmetic, algebra, and geometry basics, and then moved straight into sectional mocks.
DILR (Data Interpretation & Logical Reasoning): ~30%. I solved 1–2 sets daily from past CAT papers and mock test material. For me, the key was exposure to different puzzle types.
VARC (Verbal Ability & Reading Comprehension): ~30%. This was the toughest - I forced myself to read long articles every day from Aeon, The Hindu, or The Guardian, then practiced RCs under time limits.
I also signed up for a mock test series. At first, my percentiles were inconsistent - sometimes in the 95s, sometimes crossing 99. But every single mock gave me insights into my strengths and weaknesses.
I cannot emphasize this enough: mocks were my actual teachers. I didn’t treat them as pass/fail, I treated them as feedback loops.
After every mock, I would spend 2–3 hours analyzing mistakes:
Which QA questions were “sitters” that I missed due to speed or overconfidence?
Which DILR sets were solvable but I panicked and skipped?
In VARC, was I losing marks due to wrong inference or poor time allocation?
I created an Excel tracker where I logged my accuracy in each section. Over time, this helped me see patterns - e.g., I was consistently misinterpreting tone/inference questions in RC, or mismanaging time in DI-heavy sets.
My percentile graph slowly started stabilizing in the high 80s and 90s.
This was my comfort zone. My years of teaching JEE maths gave me a solid advantage - I didn’t need to relearn topics like arithmetic or algebra. What I did instead was focus on:
Speed: mental calculations, eliminating options quickly.
Selection: identifying sitters in the paper instead of wasting time on tough ones.
Shortcuts: using my teaching experience to recall multiple solving paths and pick the fastest one.
Highest Package 27.25 LPA | Top 100 Average package 16.65 LPA | AACSB Accredited | Ranked 52 by QS International
400+ Recruiters | Highest CTC 21 LPA | Average CTC 8 LPA | 92% Placements in 2025 | Ranked as Platinum Institute | Awarded Best Business School of the Year
QA became my strongest section, and I knew going into CAT that it could “boost” my score.
This was initially my weak spot. Early mocks were brutal - I could barely solve 1 set in 40 minutes. But I learned that CAT DILR is less about formulas and more about pattern recognition.
So my approach was:
Solve 2 sets daily under time pressure.
Practice old CAT sets repeatedly until I could “see the logic” faster.
Focus on set selection - skip the toughest ones immediately.
By November, I was consistently solving 2–3 sets per mock.
This was my toughest battle. Unlike math, I didn’t have a natural advantage here. Initially, I would read passages too fast, misinterpret details, and lose accuracy.
What helped me was:
Building a daily reading habit with diverse topics (philosophy, economics, literature).
Practicing RCs with strict time limits to improve focus.
Learning to trust first instincts on para-jumbles/summary instead of overthinking.
By the end, I wasn’t perfect in VARC, but I reached a level where I could manage a safe attempt rate with decent accuracy.
Overconfidence in QA: Since I was strong here, I neglected revision for months. Silly mistakes in mocks reminded me that even strong areas need sharpening.
Procrastinating DILR: For a long time, I avoided it because it was frustrating. The only way I improved was by forcing myself into a daily habit.
Mock Score Anxiety: Early on, I let bad scores affect me. Later, I realized mocks are practice grounds, not verdicts.
The last month before CAT was about fine-tuning:
2–3 mocks per week instead of daily.
More focus on analyzing errors than solving new material.
Revising formula sheets and frequently repeated DILR puzzle types.
Light daily reading to keep VARC momentum.
I also worked on exam temperament - staying calm, managing the clock, and moving on quickly from stuck questions.
On exam day, I stuck to my strategy:
VARC first: attempted passages carefully, didn’t panic if one looked tough.
DILR next: spent the first 5 minutes scanning sets, picked 2 doable ones.
QA last: played to my strength, targeted accuracy along with volume.
Walking out, I didn’t feel like I had “crushed it,” but I knew I had played to my strengths and managed weaknesses.
Leverage your background. If you’re strong in math, make QA your scoring area. If you’re a reader, use that to your advantage in VARC. Don’t try to prepare like everyone else.
Mocks are gold. Don’t chase high percentiles in the beginning; chase improvement in accuracy and decision-making.
Section balance matters. CAT is not cleared by excelling in one section alone - you need decent performance across all three.
Consistency > intensity. It’s better to study 2–3 hours daily for months than to cram sporadically.
Stay calm. CAT is as much about temperament as it is about preparation.
For me, CAT 2024 was not just an exam but an extension of everything I’d been doing for years - teaching math, solving problems, balancing academics and passions. My journey wasn’t about turning weaknesses into strengths overnight. It was about playing to my strengths in QA, making DILR manageable, and bringing VARC up to a safe level.
If there’s one message I’d give to future aspirants, it’s this: CAT isn’t about being perfect, it’s about being prepared enough to maximize your score on that one day.
On Question asked by student community
With 84.91 percentile in CAT (General, male, no work experience), top colleges like IIMs, IITs, FMS, MDI, etc. are not possible. You may get calls from private institutes such as IMT Nagpur/Hyderabad, IMI Bhubaneswar, XIME, SDMIMD, Welingkar (some programs) and similar colleges. Universities like Amity or LPU are also options.
It’s better to choose carefully, as placements and ROI may be average. Reattempting CAT or trying XAT/CMAT could improve options.
Hello,
With a CAT percentile of 88.77 and a strong CGPA of 9.0, you are in a competitive range for newer IIMs (like IIM Amritsar, IIM Bodh Gaya, IIM Sirmaur, IIM Nagpur) and several top non-IIM B-schools such as TAPMI, BIM Trichy, Great Lakes, IMI Delhi, FORE School of Management, and KJ Somaiya. You may not reach the older IIMs (Ahmedabad, Bangalore, Calcutta, etc.) since they usually require 98+ percentile, but you have excellent chances at mid-tier and emerging institutes.
For more details access mentioned link below:
Hope it helps.
Hello
The expected cutoff for the JAP (Joint Admission Process) is around 90 to 95th percentile, with a minimum sectional cutoff of around 75 percentile in Quantitative Ability. You have scored 82.2% which is very low; that's why you are unlikely to meet the minimum criteria for the JAP IIMs in the general Category.
I hope this information helps you.
Thank you.
Hello,
Here is your IIM Cutoff for Gen/OBC/SC/ST, CS Score Cut Off. I am providing you the link. Kindly open and check it out. From here you can get all the details.
I hope it will help you.
Thank you.
With a CAT score of around 80 percentile and about 2 years of work experience, getting a call from the top IIMs (IIM Ahmedabad, Bangalore, Calcutta, Lucknow, Kozhikode, Indore) is extremely difficult, as their cutoff percentiles are usually much higher, even for reserved categories. These institutes typically shortlist candidates above 95–99 percentile depending on category, academic profile, and diversity factors.
However, you may still have some chances at a few of the newer or baby IIMs, especially if you belong to a reserved category (SC/ST/OBC/EWS) and have a decent academic background. IIMs such as IIM Jammu, IIM Bodh Gaya, IIM Sirmaur, IIM Sambalpur, IIM Nagaland, IIM Amritsar, and IIM Vizag have historically called candidates in the 75–85 percentile range for certain categories. Your 2 years of work experience can also work in your favour, as most IIMs give weightage to professional experience during shortlisting and final selection.
That said, selection does not depend on CAT percentile alone. Factors like your 10th and 12th marks, graduation score, academic consistency, gender and academic diversity, work experience quality, and performance in the personal interview play a very important role. Even with an 80 percentile, a strong interview and profile can improve your chances at newer IIMs.
You should also keep strong non-IIM options open. At this percentile, good colleges like newer IIT MBA programs, some NITs, and reputed private B-schools can offer better and more realistic opportunities. Applying broadly and preparing seriously for the interview stage is very important.
In summary, while top IIMs are unlikely at 80 percentile, you may still have a realistic chance at some of the newer IIMs depending on your category and overall profile.
Globally Recognized by AACSB (US) & AMBA (UK) | 17.8 LPA Avg. CTC for PGPM 2025
Ranked amongst top 3% universities globally (QS Rankings)
Highest Package 27.25 LPA | Top 100 Average package 16.65 LPA | AACSB Accredited | Ranked 52 by QS International
Phase 02 Applications Window Closing on 23rd January 2026 | 100% Placement Record | Average CTC 12.75 LPA | Highest CTC 40.31 LPA | Median CTC 12.49 LPA
Application Deadline 15th Jan’26 | UGC Approved Programs | Near 100% Placement Record | Up to 100% Scholarships | Highest CTC 21.32 LPA
Ranked #36 amongst institutions in Management by NIRF | 100% Placement